The building blocks of the building blocks

As all science confirms, the photons are the basic building blocks of energy. What are photons made up of? Could there be building blocks that make up photons? I think so. Getting beneath photons, the physical dimensions are useless to conceive the ideas. Yet, to explain the dimensions beyond the known and experienced dimensions, we have to take examples from the known dimensions.

Now, the fields such as gravitational and magnetic fields should have basic building blocks as well. The basic building blocks of the fields can be strings, as explained by the string theory. They can be as small as a basic unit of space or as big as the universe. The strings in turn when their properties alternate, can create the different fields. So how about the strings? Rather than pertaining the strings are two dimensional strings, it is more logical to consider them as bubbles. Rather than having a line, these are surfaces. If you consider a soap bubble then you can understand what I am trying to say.

As I said before, I am not going to confront with or conform to any existing theories or laws. Merely, I am using those as a way of explaining what I think. Now to the bubbles; they are entities of another dimension that makeup the lower dimensions. These bubbles as I refer to them are not spatial, temporal or energetic in nature. I don’t know to name their dimension but their dimension is just above the spatial, temporal or energetic dimensions.

If you consider soap bubbles, then they are very fragile. If consider bubbles made up of oil instead of water, then they will be more flexible and less fragile. Now consider the same bubbles with more flexibility; more flexible than anything we know. Also these bubbles are self transparent. That is a term that I am using in trying to explain their properties.

These bubbles could cross their own surfaces (so to speak but they are not really surfaces as they are not spatial objects) to for various shapes. A bubble can be as small as the smallest unit of space and it could expand to the size of the universe; or in other words, a bubble could exist in the entire universe at the same time; everywhere at once.

These bubbles should be the building blocks of fields. These bubbles also should be the basic building blocks of photons. It gets nearly impossible to test something that is out of our comprehensive dimensions. There is one hope. If we can propose the effects of the extra dimensions into the comprehensive dimensions, then we can test for the effects in the comprehensive dimensions.

Now, the bubbles as I said, could take any shape (though they are not spatial; we have to imagine them in some way) by folding onto their surfaces. They can form strings, flat formations like circles and triangles or 3D (not to be confused as spatial dimensions; this is to explain the properties of the bubbles) formations like cubes and spheres.

The bubbles are also transparent to each other until a certain number of bubbles share the same spatial dimension. If the number of bubbles exceeds the critical number within a given one least unit of space, they turn into photons. If this is right, then an excessive field of gravity or magnetism should produce photons.

Like I proposed to test the formation of mass from energy, I can propose an experiment to test if this is true. The easiest field that we could create in gigantic proportions is the magnetic field. If we could bring two magnets together, then their fields will interact and create a different resultant magnetic field. Since these are fields, you cannot fire them from different angles to meet at the center. What we can do is place negative points of magnets towards the center and makes a magnetic pulse to occur in the center.

The best way to handle our experiment is to have electromagnets so that we can raise and drop the strength of the field. If you consider two bar magnets put closer facing the similar poles, then they will push each other. If you placed them in just one tenth of a millimeter and started to increase their magnetic strength, then they will be pushing each other stronger than earlier. Now, if we placed some twenty bar magnets in a circular arrangement and had all the north ends towards the center of the circle, then there will be resultant push in the center.

If we had constructed an arrangement where there is enough magnetic strength in the middle to push harder so that the spot at the center of the circle faces maximum magnetic field that could exist, then the result should be energy. There should be energy forming out of the center of the magnetic ring. Since the first formations will be single photons with the lowest energy quanta, it would more probably heat waves or infrared radiation of very lower energy.

How do we know the maximum strength of a magnetic field that could exist before turning into energy? I can suggest a way. If you take the amount of energy needed to create a magnetic field with a particular strength, then you can calculate how much energy is needed to produce what strength of magnetic field.

The problem is, that the magnetic field is not a spot measurement. It is a vector. You have to get it into a numerical value without directions. To do that; we will have to take a volume of space and add the magnetic strength of imaginary spheres in the volume. Let me explain further.

You have to first define a volume of space. Per say, I meter from the center of the magnet in all directions. Then you have to define imaginary spherical units of the field. Per say, a sphere of 1 millimeter in diameter; this will give you a countable number of spheres within the given volume. It is difficult but you can devise a formula to add up all the numerical values of all the spheres in the given volume. Ignore the directions and add them up to get a scalar result. This will give a relationship between the electricity used to produce the magnetic field and the magnitude of the magnetic field itself.

The relationship should be linear. Once this is known, you can then apply values to that devised formula to see which amount of electricity would produce the outermost imaginary spheres to have zero value of the magnetic field. Then you will have to calculate the energy needed to produce zero value at the second innermost spheres in the magnetic field. You can devise a formula that will give you the result to produce equally strong adjacent layer of spheres from the middle. There will never be an equal value. You will end up with a difference of infinitively smaller value between the first layer of spheres and the second layer of spheres. It is at this point you can take the magnetic strength at the center as the maximum exist-able magnetic strength.

Since there is no such equation, theory or law yet, we unfortunately have to rely on this hypothesis and carry on the experiment to know the answers. When you calculate the maximum exist-able magnetic field strength, it would not be accurate but will be very closer. It is like calculating and producing an exact value for Pi. There is not exact value yet, but the value gets more and more accurate as we calculate further. By the way, Pi cannot be an infinite value; I will get to that later.

Once we have calculated and appropriate value for the maximum exist-able magnetic strength, we can use that value to produce a greater resultant magnetic field in the experiment proposed above. Since the first emergence would be lower energy waves, it is very logical to keep the experiment at absolute zero and in a vacuum status to avoid the absorption of heat by the air molecules at the center of the circle.

If we reversed the direction of the magnetic fields and had all same poles pointing towards the center, then there will be a maximum pull by the magnets. When we apply the maximum strength, the spot at the center of the circle will experience the same effect but in an opposite manner. This time, energy should be absorbed from the energy has to be released from somewhere. If you place a radiation material at the center, you can notice it irradiating. If you place a vacuum at the center then you will see that energy is being absorbed from the environment into the center. You can check it by measuring the density of daylight in that particular space; it will get lower and lower as energy will be absorbed by the particles at the center.

It all sounds fictitious or even hilarious until someone tries these experiments. I am not just stating something phenomenal, I am also giving experiments to conduct and check the results. I cannot conduct them by myself for two reasons. One is that I don’t have the facilities to conduct experiments at that level. The second reason is that I am not educated to handling that level of equipments. I don’t even hold a B.Sc; trust me.

So, these bubbles are the basic building blocks of the fields. The bubbles are also the basic building blocks of photons but the fields are not the basic building blocks of photons. It is exactly like how photons are the basic building blocks of energy and they are also the basic building blocks of the least unit of mass which in turn builds up mass.

The string theory which is now M theory which I am no expert at might be referring to these issues; I don’t know. To me, strings are not the candidates for being the basic of everything. It should be bubbles that make up even the strings. In other words, strings are merely a two dimensional (though the strings are demonstrated as one dimensional entities) state of the bubbles where the bubbles can actually have three dimensional existences.

I have come so far trying to explaining a common reason to make up the fields, energy, mass and space but still I could not explain the nature of time and I haven’t proposed any way to interact time with these other dimensions. If time is to interact with all of these other dimensions, then there has to be an even further state of dimensions where time has a common factor with all the other dimensions.

I will relate time to the other dimensions, and the basic building blocks of time and the interaction between all these dimensions. A theory of everything should be able to explain everything. A theory of everything should be able describe the genes and heredity, the nanotechnology and wormholes, ghosts and angels, UFOs and aliens, evolution and species, a mathematical value for infinity and zero, and so on. That is where I am headed towards; to explain everything in one theory.

I will touch down the temporal dimensions in my next post; until then yours, in thinking - Q