When the universe started from singularity through big bang,
there was no time. So time should have begun there, or it should have been
formed. If something could be formed, then it should also be destroyed or
transformed. The singularity or nothing as we did call it because it is nothing
for us that we cannot understand, comprehend, measure, quantify or describe it.
It should not be confused as a massive mass with an infinitesimally small
volume and space or anything like that. It was different; entirely different
that it was not mass, it was not time, it was not energy, it was not space and
it was nothing; it was singularity.
The first two things that should have formed must be the
time and space for anything else to exist. The first two products should have
been time and space. The first product should have been time rather than space.
Time could exist without space but space cannot exist without time. Time can
transform into space and other dimensions. The other dimensions can form time
as well.
Space is not necessarily continuous along the universe. There
must be pockets where there is no space but voids that have nothing in them. In
a void, no space, no energy and no mass could exist but time can. By saying
void, I don’t mean a vacuum; no, not even vacuum would exist in a void. By our
scientific measurements, we cannot directly see a void. Only way to check if
there are voids in the space is to check along the time and see differences.
A void cannot have spatial dimensions but essentially there
will be space around the void. This space around the void could not be seen as
having something in the middle like a pocket because having a void in the
middle would not affect the spatial dimensions but will affect time.
If you consider the dimension of time within the void, that
is the duration of time inside the void, then there would be discrepancies in the
times when you conduct some observations around the void. For example, if a
beam of light is travelling through a volume of space where a pocket of void is
present, then the light would not travel through the void because there is no
space inside the void. Nevertheless, the light will still have to pass through
the time inside the void. This will create a delay in the travel of light.
The voids are more probable around the places where time
could be released as a side effect some activity. Time should be made in some
processes and should be absorbed in some other processes. It is most probable
for time to be formed in places where reactions opposite to that happened in
the beginning of the big bang. There are such reactions taking place in the
black holes.
Black holes are not entities of massive mass that have
infinitesimally less volume; no, black holes are just space volumes where the
gravity is just too high. The gravity in a place can replace the influence of
mass in the same place.
The black holes in the center of galaxies are not just the
only ones out there. Since the stars and all celestial bodies in a galaxy are
rotating, they automatically have a center of gravity to the galactic body. This
center of gravity will be pulled from all sides by the objects. Due to the pull
from all objects towards all other objects, a resultant gravity is formed in
the center of gravity. This then is the force that pulls things in. As the
center starts to pull all mass in, the masses react with each other too. As they
move towards the galactic center, the gravitational forces of the adjacent objects
will lead them to lean away from the center, forming a new center of gravity. As
all the objects start moving, they just confuse and displace the center of
gravity until they get into circular or similar orbits. Once all the objects
start moving around the center in a circular or similar path, then the galactic
center of gravity remains relatively stable than it was before. Once the center
of galactic gravity is reasonably stable, then all the objects are now being
pulled towards the center but also are travelling in a cyclical or similar
path. This will create the massive force of gravity that is equal to the
unequal forces of gravity between the bodies that are exactly in the opposite directions.
That is when two objects are in the opposite directions to
the center and have the same and equal mass, they will create the same and equivalent
gravitational pull at the center and that will result in zero gravity. If a
galaxy had perfectly aligned objects that had spun around in perfect distances
and directions to cancel out each other’s gravity, then there would be no
resultant gravity in the center of a galaxy. Hence, there would be no black
hole in the centre of such galaxy too.
Galaxies with more flat planes should have the most powerful
black holes than the ones with more perpendicular sizes. If a galaxy was more
flat, then the objects have to be in perfectly opposite directions and
distances to cancel out the effects in the center but if a galaxy is less flat,
then the opposites up and down the plane can have cumulative effects on gravity
from objects in all sides which will result in more balancing and cancelling of
gravity in the center of the galaxy.
A galaxy should also have a maximum mass that it could hold.
There should also be a maximum speed for a galaxy to rotate. At a certain
rotation speed, the galactic center and the black hole will be more stable. If the
galaxy is a little bit slower, it will be pulling objects in. If mass or energy
enters into the black hole, they will have to experience the pressure of the
gravitational pull and therefore disintegrate. In flat galaxies, the effect
will be less aggressive because they will have a larger area where the gravity
is distributed and the center is not in a very tight space. In much thicker
galaxies, because of the gravity cancelation at all sites, the center of
gravity will have less resultant gravity but within a very tiny space. So the
effect of the black hole will be very aggressive.
So for our observations, we will see flat galaxies having
black holes that weigh heavier than those in thicker galaxies. In fact, there
is no mass in the black hole; it is only gravity.
It is not necessary that the galactic centers that have
black holes; black holes could be found in the center of galactic clusters
where the resultant gravity from all the galaxies in the group are creating a
center of gravity. And this place will be much intensive but also will be with
much bigger space. If we find a black hole in the center of the home group,
then it will not just be black hole but it will be a black space with a black
hole in the middle. This black space will defy all electromagnetic laws and will
behave insane. It will not absorb light completely but will bend it, slow it
down or even speed it up. It will disturb the time; it will disturb the gravity
itself.
To check if there are black holes in the centers of galactic
clusters, we can measure the gravity or the mass that is present in the space
in the center of the galactic clusters. If we have an estimated mass of
galaxies in a cluster, then we can predict the gravitational center of that
cluster. If we observe that place, it would be just space without any objects
but will have mass. This is not actually mass, but the resultant gravity that
creates a pull onto the surrounding galaxies. Dark matter might be present but
most of the unseen mass that should be there according to mathematical calculations
is because there are black holes and black spaces in places where we have not
looked for. And these are fields of gravity that is so big, they are
responsible for a vast amount of mass that is being calculated.
And there will be black spaces and black holes in between
the galactic clusters and then finally there will be a black hole and a
gigantic black space at and around the gravitational center of the universe. Finding
out the gravitational center of the universe will also reveal the real center
of the universe.
If we look in a perpendicular direction to the galactic
plane of our own galaxy which easier because we are at the outer side of the
galaxy, we can measure the resultant gravity and see which side has much pull.
If we check around in 360 by 360 degrees and plot a 3D graph to see how strong
the gravity was in each of those directions, then we can deduct the effects of
our solar system, galaxy, and home group and then see where the resultant
gravity points to. It will be at that direction that the center of the universe
will be.
Back to the point of time, space and void. So, black holes
are so massively forceful that they destroy anything that gets into them and
smashes them to similar conditions that were present closer to the time of the
big bang. At the very center of gravity in a black hole where the least unit of
space could exist; if a point of mass enters there, it cannot remain as mass. It
will then be destroyed into more basic building blocks of the universe. Even space
should be pulled too roughly that it would disintegrate at the very center of
the black hole. This is where, voids could be formed. A void is a place without
space but time; can exist. The black hole cannot disintegrate time but we might
experience lack of time inside the black hole or our measurements could
indicate that time has been absorbed inside the black hole and that is because
time can exist inside void and we have no way to get inside the void or to
measure it; not yet.
When mass is destroyed, it does not just form energy. It cannot
form just energy; there should be time being released and space being absorbed.
At sites of black holes, it is mostly the space that is being ripped off and
destroyed to form voids and energy. These voids are places packed with time but
nothing else. When and if the time inside the voids would transform, then it
will transform into space and energy so that the void will be filled with
space. There should be a linear relationship between the magnitude of the void
and the magnitude of the time encapsulated by it.
By observing a black hole away from it, we can encounter
voids in between us and the black holes. If we consider different electromagnetic
radiations stream, rays or beam originating from the galactic center, we can
see that they travelled in different time durations, although their speed was
the same.
The trouble is, if two beams travelled in the same speed
across the same distance, they should both be at the destination at the same
time. If you observe a black that is in a galaxy whose plane is perpendicular
to the observer, then the energy and radiation coming out of the black hole
will not have much interaction by the objects in the same galaxy as the waves
are travelling perpendicular to the plane where most objects are. If we are
able measure the time taken for radiations that originated at the same event,
we will definitely see differences between the time duration but still, their
speeds will be the same.
And that is because there are voids where time is present
but space is not. When a radiation comes through the space where the void is,
the radiation cannot travel through the void as it is not space but travels
through additional time because there is time inside the void. This will result
in the radiation that travelled encountering a void to take longer time to
arrive at destination. Still, if you measure the speed at which it arrived at
destination, it will not be lower; but the resultant velocity will be lower due
to the additional time taken.
When mass enters into the black hole and becomes space and
energy absorbing time, the voids will be filled with space and energy and will
be gotten rid of the time that was captured in them. If time was absorbed from
a spatial dimension then more space than where the time was absorbed from will
collapse to form void, energy and will leave additional time being inside the
void.
There should be a linear relationship between the magnitude
of time absorbed from a space and the magnitude of space that will collapse to
form void and energy.
Nearby the black holes, it will mostly be the space that
turns into void and energy. Only very rarely would there be mass turning into
space, energy and absorbing time. This is because for the basic unit of mass to
get ripped off, it has to travel to the least unit of space inside the black
hole and the probabilities of a unit of mass entering the exact same spot are
very much lower. And this is due to the fact that the resultant gravity is
changing the center of gravity continuously. When observed in a larger scale it
is insignificant but when looking at a nano scale, it is obvious that before an
object can reach to the exact center, it would either be distracted by centrifugal
force of the rotation which it would have gained as a result of extreme speeds
or simply turn around the center and travel in an elliptical orbit.
But when mass does get destroyed and create space and energy
absorbing time, we should be able to measure that but there are few little
issues. Since this action creates space and absorbs time, there is much space
with less time is formed between us and the location where this reaction takes
place.
If there were voids where this action takes place then the
void would lose time and gain space and energy to disappear but if there were
no voids then it will be more space collapsing and forming voids because there
is time being absorbed?
If there were voids and they gave up time and filled in with
space and energy, then we will have much space but less time. If there were no
voids and the action took place, then we will have less space and double the
magnitude of time less than in the first action. The time I am talking is not
just the unidirectional time in seconds but it includes it as well.
If there was the first type of reaction taking place then we
will have radiation coming to us in shorter time periods but with the same
speeds. That means, we will feel intensified radiation waves. If the second
type of action takes place then we will have less time but much less space
which means that the radiations will be coming in the same speed but will have
taken much time to reach us.
Now, both reactions can take place star formations and in
stars. Our own sun in the solar system is using mass to produce energy. It should
also create space and absorb time. There will be voids formed and deformed. As a
void is filled with space, then there is no void. When time is absorbed from space,
then there will be voids forming. Ultimately, it is the time that will be
absorbed. The space will be formed and then absorbed and then formed. The energy
will be released. The time gap between the stars and us will get shorter and
the exposure to the energy will be higher or intensified. This is if the time
absorbed is absorbed only from the linear direction towards us.
Still, even when time is not linear, we can measure these
waves travelling at same speeds but having taken different time intervals to
reach the same distance. It is much easier to observe radiation from the sun
than observing radiation from the middle of black holes.
Alright; if time could be formed and deformed, if space
could be formed and deformed, if mass and energy could be formed and deformed
then how is it possible that they create each other? There should be some
relationships that make them to turn into each other.
It is like energy can transform and take different forms. Electricity,
heat, light, gamma rays and other forms of electromagnetic radiation are all
made up of photons. Depending on the wavelength and energy level, they
transform into each other forms of energy. Basically they are all different
arrangements of photons with different magnitudes of characters.
So what is it or what are those that are common to all mass,
energy, space and time? What is it that makes it possible that everything came
into existence from nothing?
There has to be something that is the basic building block
of everything. Can something be the basic building block for time as well as
energy and mass? Can space be made up of the same basic building blocks that
make up time? Does time have a basic building block?
Yes; definitely, time is not continuous, it must be discrete.
There must be a minimum unit of time. Space must be discrete as well; there
must be a minimum unit of space. The same should be true for mass. We know that
it is true for energy; that there is a minimum unit for energy to exist.
In the next post; I will tell you what I know.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be thoughtful and mindful please... Also suggest me to write if you have some specific subject in mind.